Can a married person be in live-in relationship?

Can a married person be in live-in relationship?

P&H Hc | No Offence By Married Person Being In Live-In; Hc Differs With Allahabad High Court’s Decision

Punjab and Haryana High Court: Amol Rattan Singh, J., held that since adultery is not an offence, no offence would be committed by a married person by him/her being in live-in even when his/her divorce petition is pending before the Court.

By the instant petition, the petitioners had sought issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents not to harass them.

 Noticeably, petitioner 2 and respondent 4 having earlier been married, petitioner 2 filed a divorce petition, which was dismissed and appeal against which was still pending.

However, it was observed by the court that there were no chances of reconciliation.

The petitioners submitted that they were in a live-in relationship with each other and were in apprehension of danger to their life and liberty at the hands of respondents 4 to 6, with the SHO, Police Station Samrala, District Ludhiana, harassing them at the instance of the said respondents.

Differing with the judgement of Allahabad High Court in Aneeta v. State of U.P., WRIT – C No. 14443 of 2021 (dated 29-07-2021), wherein, it had dismissed the petition filed by live-in couple with exemplary cost of Rs. 500 by holding that “without obtaining a divorce, a spouse is not entitled to protection qua a relationship with another person”; the Bench stated that prima facie, no offence would be committed by the petitioners, they being adults in a live-in-relationship with each other, whether or not any divorce petition was pending before the court.

Considering the judgement of Supreme Court in Joseph Shine v.Union of India, (2019) 3 SCC 39, by which the Supreme Court had struck down Section 497 (adultery) of the IPC as being unconstitutional and violative of Articles 14, 15 and 21 of the Constitution, the Bench directed the police officials concerned to ensure that the life and liberty of the petitioners is duly protected at the hands of respondents 4 to 6, as also at the hands of the SHO.

The Bench warned of strict actions in case the petitioners are again harassed by the SHO on account of any live-in-relationship that they have with each other. [Paramjit Kaur v. State of Punjab, CRWP-7874 of 2021, decided on 03-09-2021]

 

Related

All HC | Can the family members harass a couple who on attaining majority got married and started living together? HC reiterates SC's position September 10, 2020

 

In "Case Briefs"

Telangana HC | In what conditions a complaint of bigamy filed by wife is maintainable when another complaint under S. 498-A IPC is already pending?

 

 Court discusses June 30, 2021In "Case Briefs"

All HC | Is any offence committed if two adults wish to be in a live-in relationship? Read what HC ruled December 4, 2020 In "Case Briefs"

 

NEXT STORY Adoption (Amendment) Regulations, 2021 notified to ease the process of inter-country adoptions

 

HIGH COURTS

Conviction of the accused guilty of killing his wife upheld on basis of circumstantial evidence

CASE BRIEFSHIGH COURTS

[Custody] MP HC | Welfare of child is of paramount importance; Mother who nurtured the child for 9 months in womb is certainly entitled to custody

CASE BRIEFS HIGH COURTS

HP HC | Courts must follow a humane and justice oriented approach when there is no inordinate delay, and opposite party can be monetarily compensated

FACT CHECKSNEWS

Fact Check: Has Justice Dalveer Bhandari been elected as the Chief Justice of the ICJ?

CASE BRIEFS HIGH COURTS

What are the essential ingredients that a landlord is required to show for purpose of getting an eviction order for bonafide needs? Del HC elaborates

CASE BRIEFS HIGH COURTS

All HC | For offence of dishonour of cheques, what needs to be given priority – Compensatory aspect or Punitive aspect?

CASE BRIEFSSUPREME COURT

“There is a disturbing tendency of courts setting aside arbitral awards …”: SC upholds arbitration award of Rs 2728 crore plus interest in favour of Delhi Airport Metro Express (P) Ltd.

TAG law, #Live-in-relationship, #PunjabandHaryanaHighCourt

808