47 years old legal dispute finally decided

Would you like to know about the longest civil suit in Indian legal history?
For 47 years, Rampur Nawab’s family fought over his inheritance. Finally, SC decided the matter this week. The feud started in 1969, when Zulfiquar Ali Khan, younger brother of Murtaza Ali Khan, challenged the certificate of inheritance issued by government of India in favour of the eldest son of the family.

On the basis of certificate of inheritance issued by government, Murtaza Ali Khan, the eldest son of Nawab’s family took charge as Nawab in April 1966.

The case is related to the legacy of Raza Ali Khan, the Nawab of Rampur, who decided to accede to the Indian union in 1949. After, his death, the eldest son, Murtaza Ali Khan, took over as Nawab and claimed absolute property rights, over all the private properties of Rampur Nawab.

The younger son, terming this illegal decided to challenge this inheritance on the basis of Muslim Personal Law. He was joined in the litigation by three of his sisters.

When Raza Ali Khan died in 1966, he had three wives, three sons and six daughters. His eldest son Murtaza Ali Khan succeeded him as head of the state, as per custom. The government recognised him as the sole inheritor of all his father’s private properties and issued a certificate to this effect.

But his brother challenged this in the civil court. Thus, began a royal property dispute in which the courts were asked to decide if inheritance should be based on Muslim personal law or the unique gaddi system the royal family followed before joining the Indian Union.

Deciding in favour of younger brother, in December 1969, the Delhi High Court quashed the certificate of Murtaza Ali Khan. It meant, the Court ruled in favour of equal division of property among all the brothers and sisters.

Using the Delhi High Court judgement, Talat Fatima Hasan, the daughter of one of Raza Ali Khan’s daughters, moved a petition in a civil court in Rampur in 1970 asking for the properties to be divided. The court issued an interim order that the assets should neither be transferred nor disposed.

But the family squabble ran into an unexpected event: in December 1971, Prime Minister Indira Gandhi amended the Constitution and abolished privy purses. Murtaza Ali Khan, who was receiving Rs 7 lakh annually as a privy purse from the Indian government as the Nawab of Rampur, lost his income, with his wealth stuck in litigation.

For over 20 years, the suit to partition the properties stayed pending before the civil court. Then in 1995, the Allahabad High Court withdrew the suit from the civil court and placed it before itself. By then, Murtaza Ali Khan had died.

In the High Court, his descendants argued that two palaces – Khas Bagh Palace and the Sahbad Castle – had been recognised by the government of India in 1954 as the official residence of the ruler of Rampur. These palaces, along with their furniture, fixtures, equipment, pictures, motor garage, water works plant, dhobi-ghat, land and gardens were adjuncts of the ruler and could not be the subject matter of a suit, the argument went.

The High Court accepted this reasoning and dismissed the suits for partition in 1997. Talat Fatima Hasan then moved the Supreme Court.

Shariat or Gaddi?
The Nawabs are Shia Muslims. The central dispute in the civil suits was whether as Shia Muslims, the Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Application Act would apply to the inheritance or the gaddi system that the family practiced before Independence. Murtaza Ali Khan wanted the gaddi system whereas the Talat Fatima Hasan pressed for the Muslim personal law.

The instrument of accession made a distinction between the Rampur state’s public properties, which became vested in the government of India, and the Nawab’s private properties, which formed his inheritance.

Lawyers for Murtaza Ali Khan and his legal heirs argued that private properties of the ruler were not entirely private – they were attached to the gaddi or the rulership. And so, they stayed with the person declared the Nawab.

But the Supreme Court refused to accept this argument. In the judgement, the bench said following their accession to the Indian union in 1949 and with the Constitution of India being enforced in 1950, the Nawabs were merely titular rulers who enjoyed certain privileges and privy purses. They neither had territory nor subjects. With sovereignty lost, the gaddi system had ceased to exist. The court said:

“When they were actual sovereigns, their entire State was attached to the Gaddi and not any particular property. There are no specific properties which can be attached to the Gaddi. It has to be the entire ‘State’ or nothing.

Since, we have held that they were rulers only as a matter of courtesy, to protect their erstwhile titles, the properties which were declared to be their personal properties had to be treated as their personal properties and could not be treated as properties attached to the Gaddi.”

Therefore, the court ruled that properties of the Nawab have to be divided according to the Shariat, which means that not only will male members of the family be entitled to a share, the women will also inherit a part of the estate.

Among them is Begum Noor Bano, the wife of Zulfiquar Ali Khan, who set the ball rolling in the courts when he challenged his brother, the Nawab’s oldest son, Murtaza Ali Khan, 47 years ago. And also Talat Fatima Hasan, the granddaughter of Raza Ali Khan, who took the battle further.

So, in the end it can be safely concluded that “Adalat mein der hai per andher nahi”, means it may take time but ultimately justice will be done.

48


More updates


Insurance Claim Settlement


News You Can Use.


कोरोना में पैरेंट्स को राहत:सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने कहा- स्कूल चलाने का खर्च कम हुआ, इसलिए ऑनलाइन क्लासेस की फीस घटानी चाहिए


Big Day: Big News


रेमडेसिविर की कालाबाजारी में प्रख्यात न्यूरो सर्जन सहित 3 गिरफ्तार, इंजेक्शन की बड़ी खेप और 36 लाख रुपये बरामद


Are you ready?


Can winking and Blowing kisses land you in Jail ?


Setback for Britannia Industries as Delhi HC junks trademark infringement plea against ITC Limited


नोएडा, गाजियाबाद से दिल्ली में लग रहे जाम पर सुप्रीम कोर्ट हुआ सख्त, जारी किया नोटिस


UNHOLY HOLI, Will Holi land you in Jail ?


क्रिप्टोकरेंसी को सरकार ने किया स्वीकार! कंपनियों को देना होगा हर लेन-देन का हिसाब


Reservation more than 50 per cent is need of hour: Maharashtra


आईटीआर में खामी रह जाने पर इनकम टैक्स 7 तरह के नोटिस जारी करता है, जानिए इनका मतलब


Person Who Has Not Drawn The Cheque Cannot Be Prosecuted U/s 138 NI Act Even In Case Of Joint Liability: Supreme Court


Didda Copyright Row: दिद्दा कॉपीराइट विवाद पर मुश्किल में कंगना, कोर्ट के आदेश पर एक और FIR दर्ज


फैसला: सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने किराएदार पर लगाया एक लाख का जुर्माना, अद्भुत मामला दिया करार


चेतावनी! 15000 रुपए का कटेगा चालान और 2 साल की होगी जेल, अगर गाड़ी में किया यह काम


Oyo lost arbitral battle


पत्नी कोई गुलाम या संपत्ति नहीं, पति के साथ रहने के लिए मजबूर नहीं किया जा सकता- सुप्रीम कोर्ट


किसी को शादी के लिए झूठा वादा नहीं करना चाहिए, चाहे पुरुष हो या महिला: सुप्रीम कोर्ट


How to jump the corporate ladder by selling Gossip at 15 Crore ?


सुप्रीम कोर्ट की बड़ी टिप्पणी: जीवनसाथी की प्रतिष्ठा को ठेस पहुंचाना मानसिक क्रूरता के समान


सुप्रीम कोर्ट की बड़ी टिप्पणी: जीवनसाथी की प्रतिष्ठा को ठेस पहुंचाना मानसिक क्रूरता के समान


पिता की संपत्ति में मिलता है बराबरी का हिस्‍सा, हर बहू-बेटी को पता होने चाहिए अपने ये अधिकार


उत्तराधिकार पर सुप्रीम कोर्ट का बड़ा फैसला, महिला का मायका पक्ष भी परिवार का हिस्सा


Act beyond Act: CSR


स्किन से स्किन टच के बिना सेक्सुअल असॉल्ट का मामला नहीं... हाई कोर्ट के इस फैसले के खिलाफ महिला आयोग सुप्रीम कोर्ट पहुंची


Decriminalisation of the Limited Liability Partnership Act


Budget 2021: Key changes in GST to help small and medium- sized businesses


1 to 5 crore loan without colletral made easy: Budget 2021


Is GST is becoming a headache for you.


Moment of rare pride


बिहार पुलिस के सर्कुल ने बिहार प्रेस बिल की याद दिला दी है


Italy court orders Facebook to pay $5 million in damages for copying app


Foreigner To Deposit Cash Amount For Bail


How legal is COVID-19 vaccine ?


WhatsApp's private chat leaked on Google, anyone can read your personal talks


Do you know 18 must Laws for every Indian?


Why should I trust you or your business?


Do you need clearance from your RWA to employ your maid?


क्या तलाकशुदा पत्नी घरेलू हिंसा अधिनियम के तहत निवास के अधिकार का दावा कर सकती है?


SC grants Woman's Right to Residence Under the Domestic Violence Act


Corporate War: Cookie King who fought with TATA and Ambani


HINDU MARRIAGE ACT : DIVORCE GRANTED TO HUSBAND ON THE GROUND OF MENTAL CRUELTY CAUSED BY WIFE


Facebook love or chat can land you in Jail


Financer can take way Car in case of payment default


18000 Crore Company, 8000 Crore personal worth, wife & sons living in street


Do you love your wife and children?


When the second marriage of a married woman / man becomes an offense under section 494


Is Rhea Chakraborty guilty?


Daughters have equal right in ancestral property


Is second wife entitled for share in Property?


How to save your hard-earned wealth from legal hassles?


What will happen to property of Hindu after his death?


Are you safe at home?


Can sex with your own wife land you in jail ?


Can you land in jail for sharing Obscene Message online in private?


Legally speaking who discovered America?


Are you a victim of Covid-19 Goonda Raj? Part-2


Are you a victim of Covid-19 Goonda Raj ?


Can RWA stop your maid from coming to your home?


Can you escape Contractual Obligation under Covid-19?


Coronavirus: Is vaccine found for India Inc?


Is Wife Entitled to Maintenance Even If She Runs A Business & Earns Income?


Who will pay rent for lockdown period?


Legal consequences of being whatsapp group admin

Click for more updates

© 4C Supremelaw Int.